One of the most profound and simplistic characterizations of human personalities came from a lovely, vivacious woman I knew many years ago. Her name was Rita Holt, wife of a tattooed ex-mariner and fellow editor at the Army Times Publishing Co. in Washington, D.C.
It seems she once spent six months in a tuberculosis (TB) sanitarium (the prescribed treatment in those days). During a social gathering of journalists, she told us how tedious life was there for patients.
“My roommate and I grew real bored after the first few months,” Rita said. “We finally hit upon a plan to categorize all the people with whom we came into contact over the next few months. That included doctors, nurses, orderlies, janitors, visitors and other patients.”
“And what did you come up with?” I asked out of burning curiosity, having once spent long, boring weeks in a hospital ward myself.
Mrs. Holt said that she and her roommate eventually came to the conclusion that all of mankind fit into one of three general categories:
“Absolutely everyone,” she told us with a sweep of her arm, “was either:
1. A dull nut;
2. An interesting nut; or
3 A dangerous nut.
We all tried for a few minutes to challenge that, or improve on it, but couldn’t.
I have since used that as a personal gauge for everyone I ever met, before or after. But it seems to be unfailingly true. Everyone is some kind of “nut.”
The only improvement, as far as I can determine, might be to use the word “semi-” in front of the adjective in some cases (as in “semi-dangerous”).
Can you improve on it?